<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563</id><updated>2012-05-21T12:12:43.027+10:00</updated><title type='text'>LVRG Scrapbook</title><subtitle type='html'>Economics as if location matters</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>43</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-5154001730311020342</id><published>2012-05-21T12:08:00.001+10:00</published><updated>2012-05-21T12:12:43.034+10:00</updated><title type='text'>Employers: How to scare off the tax man</title><summary type='text'>

Scenario 1: An employer, facing prosecution or bankruptcy for making a mistake with employees' PAYE tax, tells the ATO that if the case goes to court, “we will argue that the obligation to collect income tax from our employees at our own expense violates s.82 of the Constitution...” ...

Scenario 2: As for Scenario 1, except that the employer has apparently made a mistake with GST...

Scenario </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/5154001730311020342'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/5154001730311020342'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2012/05/employers-how-to-scare-off-tax-man.html' title='Employers: How to scare off the tax man'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-7451341474067809062</id><published>2010-05-10T11:42:00.003+10:00</published><updated>2012-04-05T14:56:10.726+10:00</updated><title type='text'>An Australian Georgist in London, April 2010</title><summary type='text'>

The purpose of the trip was to present the paper
“Land-Backed Debt as a Revenue Base” at the IU Global
Conference, London, April 26–30, 2010.  I left
little time for anything else.  Nevertheless...

April 25: Royal Observatory, Greenwich

I stayed at Bentinck House Hotel because it was about
100 metres from the conference venue (School of Economic Science,
11 Mandeville Place).  Due to “</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/7451341474067809062'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/7451341474067809062'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2010/05/australian-georgist-in-london-april.html' title='An Australian Georgist in London, April 2010'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-6715027324227521078</id><published>2010-04-27T17:56:00.004+10:00</published><updated>2010-05-07T22:35:27.961+10:00</updated><title type='text'>Land-Backed Debt as a Revenue Base</title><summary type='text'>

Presented on April 27, 2010, at the IU
Global Conference 2010 (London, April 26–30) by
Gavin R. Putland.*
Abstract
In the case of land subject to a mortgage, Henry George favoured
treating the mortgagee (lender) as a part-owner for the purpose of
the single tax. From the viewpoint of the beneficial owner (the
borrower), this provision is equivalent to compensation for the
debt against the land </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/6715027324227521078'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/6715027324227521078'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2010/04/land-backed-debt-as-revenue-base.html' title='Land-Backed Debt as a Revenue Base'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-5655346751994681212</id><published>2009-10-21T14:18:00.002+11:00</published><updated>2012-04-05T15:02:13.243+10:00</updated><title type='text'>Free trade isn't</title><summary type='text'>

The most important point about “free trade”, which
Martin Feil completely misses
(“Trade deals are a losing gamble”, The Age,
Oct.21), is that it doesn't mean what it says.  The trick is that
“free” has been redefined to mean
“non-discriminatory between domestic and foreign origins”.
As long as your trade laws don't distinguish between local and foreign
products, trade can be taxed, regulated, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/5655346751994681212'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/5655346751994681212'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/10/free-trade-isnt.html' title='Free trade isn&apos;t'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-6660967759060065709</id><published>2009-09-11T14:53:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2009-12-11T14:53:45.582+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Builders and land speculators: strange bedfellows</title><summary type='text'>Andrew J. Gunter writes in the Age
(Letters, Sep.11, 2009):



Make a stand

THE Housing Industry Association's Gil King says that “any
policies that aim to speed up development applications and increase
Victoria's housing stock are welcomed”
(The Age, 10/9).

So does the HIA support the replacement of stamp duty and payroll
tax with land tax collecting the same revenue? The replacement of
local </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/6660967759060065709'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/6660967759060065709'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/09/builders-and-land-speculators-strange.html' title='Builders and land speculators: strange bedfellows'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-8359754455511324134</id><published>2009-09-04T17:49:00.004+10:00</published><updated>2012-04-17T17:57:36.705+10:00</updated><title type='text'>Payroll tax is probably unconstitutional</title><summary type='text'>

One reason for Australia's chronic current account deficit is
payroll tax, which inflates prices of Australian products, including
exports and import replacements.  This suggests that payroll tax is
an excise, in which case it violates s.90 of the Constitution.

In the last relevant High Court case,
namely Ha v. NSW (1997), the minority accepted a
narrow definition of excises, saying that s.90 </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/8359754455511324134'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/8359754455511324134'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/09/payroll-tax-is-probably.html' title='Payroll tax is probably unconstitutional'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-5473810703370518450</id><published>2009-08-18T14:30:00.001+10:00</published><updated>2012-04-05T15:05:58.389+10:00</updated><title type='text'>Rates on Site Values don't punish home builders</title><summary type='text'>

Gill Vivian's story (‘Wrong’ rates ping home builder,
POST, 15/8, p.7)
neatly explains why local rates should be levied on “site
values” — that is, values of land and airspace,
including any attached building rights, but excluding actual
buildings.

The present system levies rates on the combined values of land and
buildings, so that owners are penalized for improving their properties
and “</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/5473810703370518450'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/5473810703370518450'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/08/rates-on-site-values-dont-punish-home.html' title='Rates on Site Values don&apos;t punish home builders'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-8411184453659838408</id><published>2009-08-16T23:14:00.002+10:00</published><updated>2012-04-05T14:51:57.193+10:00</updated><title type='text'>Wake up, Australia: Stamp duties on new cars are illegal</title><summary type='text'>

According to the definition accepted by the High Court of Australia
in Ha v. NSW and earlier cases, the duties imposed by
State governments on initial registrations of
new cars (and new motorbikes, caravans and trailers)
are duties of excise, in contravention of s.90 of the
Constitution.  That means they're illegal — so illegal that no
parliament can legalize them.



Contents




What is the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/8411184453659838408'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/8411184453659838408'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/08/wake-up-australia-stamp-duties-on-new.html' title='Wake up, Australia: Stamp duties on new cars are illegal'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-532878075052952024</id><published>2009-08-15T21:56:00.001+10:00</published><updated>2012-04-05T15:22:51.129+10:00</updated><title type='text'>Democracy as we know it makes cronyism inevitable</title><summary type='text'>

Contrary to Peter Costello's
latest pontifications in the Fairfax press, sticking to “broad
policy” that “applies equally to people of like
circumstances” does not prevent cronyism in government,
but merely ensures that the legislators will be bought and blackmailed
on larger issues by larger coalitions of interests.  And on Costello's
watch as Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia, the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/532878075052952024'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/532878075052952024'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/08/democracy-as-we-know-it-makes-cronyism.html' title='Democracy as we know it makes cronyism inevitable'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-4354363672357713391</id><published>2009-08-11T22:07:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2009-09-05T22:08:00.470+10:00</updated><title type='text'>State bias against site-value rating</title><summary type='text'>Differential rating causes a problem: it lets councils give special
favours to special interests.  So councils like it.  So the Victorian
Government allows it only for capital-improved-value rating,
which the Government prefers in spite of its economic deadweight.

That is the context of the following letter
by Andrew J. Gunter in the Age (Aug.11,
2009):



Different thinking

EVERYONE'S in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/4354363672357713391'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/4354363672357713391'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/08/state-bias-against-site-value-rating.html' title='State bias against site-value rating'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-2792338936098345190</id><published>2009-06-25T06:49:00.001+10:00</published><updated>2012-03-09T18:34:41.553+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Making the tax system comply with s.82 of the Constitution</title><summary type='text'>

A submission to the Treasury review on Australia's Future Tax
System,
by Gavin R. Putland.*



Summary

If we must have personal income tax, responsibility for
withholding PAYE tax should be shifted from employers to financial
institutions. If we must have compulsory superannuation, the
present 9% employer-funded contribution should be rolled into wages
and salaries, and future contributions </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/2792338936098345190'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/2792338936098345190'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/06/making-tax-system-comply-with-s82-of.html' title='Making the tax system comply with s.82 of the Constitution'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-8541305211865934390</id><published>2009-04-02T22:48:00.004+11:00</published><updated>2010-02-26T17:13:14.774+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Making public transport pay for itself</title><summary type='text'>

A submission to the Senate Inquiry into the
investment of Commonwealth and State funds in public passenger
transport infrastructure and services,
by Gavin R. Putland, BE
PhD.*

Abstract

The benefit of public transport is manifested as uplifts in
land values in the serviced locations.  The alleged difficulty of
funding public transport is an illusion that arises because
governments, at the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/8541305211865934390'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/8541305211865934390'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/04/making-public-transport-pay-for-itself.html' title='Making public transport pay for itself'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-6633019234033584929</id><published>2009-03-05T16:35:00.004+11:00</published><updated>2010-02-26T17:13:35.866+11:00</updated><title type='text'>100 years ago: “Mr. Max Hirsch. An appreciation”</title><summary type='text'>

BY MR R. MURRAY SMITH, C.M.G.*

One of the most intimate friends of the late
  Mr Max Hirsch was
  Mr R. Murray Smith, C.M.G., who was asked to-day to say
  something about Mr Hirsch, as he appeared to his friends.

“It gives me great pleasure to say something in eulogy of my
  old and very dear friend, the late Mr Max Hirsch.  He was a man
  of many parts, and, as you know, was industrious in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/6633019234033584929'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/6633019234033584929'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/03/100-years-ago-max-hirsch-appreciation.html' title='100 years ago: &amp;ldquo;Mr. Max Hirsch. An appreciation&amp;rdquo;'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-7229044840826124632</id><published>2009-03-04T11:16:00.003+11:00</published><updated>2010-01-05T11:21:24.187+11:00</updated><title type='text'>100 years ago: “Mr Max Hirsch dies at Vladivostock”</title><summary type='text'>A private cable message, received in Melbourne, stated that Mr Max
  Hirsch, one of the best known public men in Victoria, had died at
  Vladivostock, at 6.30 this morning.

Mr Hirsch, who left Melbourne some time ago on an extended tour,
  had not been in good health.  Death was due to cancer on the
  liver.

The deceased gentleman was a native of Cologne, Germany, where he
  was born on </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/7229044840826124632'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/7229044840826124632'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/03/100-years-ago-max-hirsch-dies-at.html' title='100 years ago: &amp;ldquo;Mr Max Hirsch dies at Vladivostock&amp;rdquo;'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-5776377758705677218</id><published>2009-02-02T11:02:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2009-02-16T18:09:14.432+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Economic policy: A snake-oil duopoly</title><summary type='text'>Gavin
R. Putland writes on the Letters Blog at the Australian:



Rudd is nаked too

Kevin Rudd has declared that the interventionists are back in
charge, the non-interventionists having “no clothes” due
to the global recession.  He conveniently forgets that the
non-interventionists took over after the interventionists were
discredited by the recession of the mid 70s, but conveniently
remembers </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/5776377758705677218'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/5776377758705677218'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/02/economic-policy-snake-oil-duopoly.html' title='Economic policy: A snake-oil duopoly'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-774089585830417282</id><published>2009-01-25T10:25:00.001+11:00</published><updated>2012-04-13T10:36:07.139+10:00</updated><title type='text'>How the Left could learn to love a retail tax</title><summary type='text'>

Conventional wisdom holds that replacing income tax with a
consumption tax would be regressive, and that it would devalue past
savings by raising prices.  Both objections assume that
gross wages and salaries would stay the same.  If, instead,
net wages and salaries stay the same, both objections
disappear.*

Contents


More exports, fewer imports, more jobs
No losers
What about housing </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/774089585830417282'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/774089585830417282'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2009/01/how-left-could-learn-to-love-retail-tax.html' title='How the Left could learn to love a retail tax'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-8944021828114149767</id><published>2008-11-20T17:22:00.001+11:00</published><updated>2009-07-23T01:24:08.336+10:00</updated><title type='text'>Will we be doing this again in 2026?</title><summary type='text'>Three years and five months after warning that
“the next adjustment of Australian interest rates would more properly
be down,” Bryan
Kavanagh claims vindication in the Age, noting that the Reserve
Bank raised interest rates by 1.75 percentage points in three years,
then dropped them 2 percentage points in three months — or two
months from meeting to meeting.  (Since then, of course, the Reserve
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/8944021828114149767'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/8944021828114149767'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2008/11/will-we-be-doing-this-again-in-2026.html' title='Will we be doing this again in 2026?'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-1076821251719233844</id><published>2008-05-19T15:35:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2012-04-05T15:36:02.154+10:00</updated><title type='text'>But why have taxes at all, dear Henry?</title><summary type='text'>

The first question for Ken Henry's tax review is whether we need
taxes at all. If retirees can live on income from assets instead of
burdening the taxpayer, why can't governments do the same?

An asset portfolio yielding just enough income to replace Federal
taxes will have the same market value that the power to impose or
avoid those taxes would have, if that power were a tradeable
asset. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/1076821251719233844'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/1076821251719233844'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2008/05/but-why-have-taxes-at-all-dear-henry.html' title='But why have taxes at all, dear Henry?'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-5139698100717627981</id><published>2008-04-03T16:14:00.001+11:00</published><updated>2010-02-26T17:14:05.253+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Still on the mountaintop: Economically rational racism</title><summary type='text'>

Gavin R. Putland marks an anniversary.

Forty years ago, as Martin Luther King Jr. spoke of the Promised Land and prophesied “I may not get there with you,” a quiet revolution in economic theory was beginning, which would ensure that Dr. King's hearers, except perhaps the occasional Caleb or Joshua, wouldn't get there either.  The architects of the revolution didn't plan it that way, but that's</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/5139698100717627981'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/5139698100717627981'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2008/04/still-on-mountaintop-economically.html' title='Still on the mountaintop: Economically rational racism'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-3856529654154458374</id><published>2008-03-28T11:37:00.001+11:00</published><updated>2009-02-16T12:40:55.958+11:00</updated><title type='text'>The recession will not be fully imported</title><summary type='text'>Australia's residential land market is a bubble about to burst.
Because property is used as collateral for loans, a bursting bubble
leaves lenders and borrowers exposed, causing a recession.  It is
therefore “irresponsible and incorrect” to blame
“spiritual emanations from U.S. subprime mortgage
lending,” says Bryan Kavanagh.  The truth, as he writes
in
this article in the Age, is that “we have </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/3856529654154458374'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/3856529654154458374'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2008/03/recession-will-not-be-fully-imported.html' title='The recession will &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; be fully imported'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-6120152823791225400</id><published>2008-02-28T19:25:00.003+11:00</published><updated>2010-02-26T17:14:39.098+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Alternative Economic Review  No. 5: The myth of progressive taxation</title><summary type='text'>





The global economic
crisis from a non-neoclassical viewpoint

Final Edition — February
2008

Editorial:

The myth of progressive taxation

By “progressive” income taxation and
“means-tested” welfare, governments make a great show of
taking from the rich and giving to the poor.  Of course this pretense
conveniently ignores such things as “business” deductions,
concessional taxation of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/6120152823791225400'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/6120152823791225400'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2008/02/alternative-economic-review-myth-of.html' title='&lt;i&gt;Alternative Economic Review&lt;/i&gt; &amp;nbsp;No.&amp;nbsp;5: The myth of progressive taxation'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-6375061029241111089</id><published>2008-01-31T18:42:00.002+11:00</published><updated>2010-02-26T17:14:52.789+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Alternative Economic Review  No. 4: Will we all be Keynesians again?</title><summary type='text'>





The global economic
crisisfrom a non-neoclassical viewpoint

January 2008

Editorial:

Will we all be Keynesians again?

As a U.S. recession looks more and more like a done deal, many will
argue that this is a great time for America to invest in public
infrastructure: railways, bus services, roads, water supplies,
underground electrical and communications cables, sewerage, drainage,
schools</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/6375061029241111089'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/6375061029241111089'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2008/01/alternative-economic-review-will-we-all.html' title='&lt;i&gt;Alternative Economic Review&lt;/i&gt; &amp;nbsp;No.&amp;nbsp;4: Will we all be Keynesians again?'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-8285922705125201865</id><published>2008-01-26T16:09:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2009-12-30T16:10:25.159+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Neutralizing stamp duty and development levies</title><summary type='text'>It is appropriate that the surge in Melbourne home prices has
rekindled debate on conveyancing stamp duty, but not so appropriate
that the discussion has focused on the size of the duty instead
of its base.  Reducing the size of the duty must have a
budgetary impact, but changing its base need not.

Stamp duty is a transfer tax on the total value of a property
including the building(s) and the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/8285922705125201865'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/8285922705125201865'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2008/01/neutralizing-stamp-duty-and-development.html' title='Neutralizing stamp duty and development levies'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-445072462237610453</id><published>2007-12-27T17:24:00.003+11:00</published><updated>2010-02-26T17:15:07.696+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Alternative Economic Review  No. 3: The tragedy of the so-called ‘commons’</title><summary type='text'>


The global economic crisisfrom a non-neoclassical viewpoint
December 2007
Editorial:
The tragedy of the so-called “commons”
There is no such phenomenon as the “tragedy of the commons”.  The phenomenon that is usually called by that name arises because the so-called “commons” are treated not as belonging to all, but as belonging to no one — in other words, because they are not commons at all.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/445072462237610453'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/445072462237610453'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2007/12/alternative-economic-review-tragedy-of.html' title='&lt;i&gt;Alternative Economic Review&lt;/i&gt; &amp;nbsp;No.&amp;nbsp;3: The tragedy of the so-called &amp;lsquo;commons&amp;rsquo;'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80864229871011563.post-9208727539208201356</id><published>2007-11-28T16:34:00.003+11:00</published><updated>2010-02-26T17:15:23.078+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Alternative Economic Review  No. 2: The immovable tax</title><summary type='text'>


The global economic crisisfrom a non-neoclassical viewpoint
November 2007
Editorial:
The immovable tax
One obvious consequence of Ricardo's law (see last month's editorial) is that a tax on the rental value of land cannot be “passed on” in the rent of the land; that is, it cannot be shifted onto a tenant.  The maximum rent that the landlord can extract is the margin by which the productivity </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/9208727539208201356'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/80864229871011563/posts/default/9208727539208201356'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scrapbook.lvrg.org.au/2007/11/alternative-economic-review-immovable.html' title='&lt;i&gt;Alternative Economic Review&lt;/i&gt; &amp;nbsp;No.&amp;nbsp;2: The immovable tax'/><author><name>GRP</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
